Correction: Virtual Morality: Transitioning from Moral Judgment to Moral Action?
نویسندگان
چکیده
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164374.].
منابع مشابه
Virtual Morality: Transitioning from Moral Judgment to Moral Action?
The nature of moral action versus moral judgment has been extensively debated in numerous disciplines. We introduce Virtual Reality (VR) moral paradigms examining the action individuals take in a high emotionally arousing, direct action-focused, moral scenario. In two studies involving qualitatively different populations, we found a greater endorsement of utilitarian responses-killing one in or...
متن کاملEmotion and Morality: The Main Factors In Moral Judgment and Moral Behaviour
Abstract: This research project has two parts. First, I argue that empathy is not necessary and not sufficient for morality. I use autistic individuals and individuals who suffer from psychopathy as my primary examples to show that empathy is not a significant source of morality. I review the literature in moral psychology and emotion research to show that emotions other than empathy, primarily...
متن کاملA comparative study of Factors influencing moral actions in Iran and Blasi’s viewpoint
One of the significant dimensions of human’s social growth is his moral development. The human being not only is a rational and intellectual being, but also is a moral being. His morality has its origin in his sociability. The human being not only is self-centered and concerned about his own interests and well-being, but also is concerned about others’ interests and their judgment of his action...
متن کاملMind Perception Is the Essence of Morality
Mind perception entails ascribing mental capacities to other entities, whereas moral judgment entails labeling entities as good or bad or actions as right or wrong. We suggest that mind perception is the essence of moral judgment. In particular, we suggest that moral judgment is rooted in a cognitive template of two perceived minds-a moral dyad of an intentional agent and a suffering moral pati...
متن کاملThe side-taking hypothesis for moral judgment
A recent theory proposes that moral judgment is an evolved strategy for choosing sides in conflicts. Evidence from moral psychology undermines previous evolutionary theories of morality focused on cooperation. I show how the side-taking hypothesis explains these otherwise puzzling patterns of moral judgment — especially its focus on actions rather than intended consequences. Moral judgment offe...
متن کامل